Friday, September 29, 2006

Paraphraising


Book Says Bush Ignored Warnings on Iraq
The White House ignored an urgent warning in September 2003 from a top Iraq adviser who said that thousands of additional American troops were desperately needed to quell the insurgency there, according to a new book by Bob Woodward. The book says President Bush’s top advisers, though often fighting internally, shared a tendency to dismiss as too pessimistic assessments from American commanders and others about the situation in Iraq. As late as November 2003, Bush is quoted as saying of the situation in Iraq: “I don’t want anyone in the cabinet to say it is an insurgency.” The book also alleges that the White House has attempted to conceal the level of violence in the country.


According to a new book by Bob Woodward, a top Iraq adviser who said Iraq need more army to stop the disturbance was ignored by The White House in September, 2003. In the book, top advisors of president Bush often have conflict internally and shared a tendency to ignore insignificant situation in Iraq.

Wednesday, September 27, 2006

Master list

Title:
Social psychology : theories, research, and applications / Robert S. Feldman.
Main Author: Feldman Robert, S (Robert Stephen), 1947-

Article
Effects of violent video games on aggressive behavior, aggressive cognition, aggressive affect, physiological arousal, and prosocial behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Scientific Literature” and it focused on the question “Does video game affect on behavior? -by Craig A. Anderson and Brad. J Bushman, Iowa State University

The Medias Effect on Violent Behavior in Society:An Annotated Bibliography Mindy Thayer Academic affiliation: Oklahoma State University

PSYCHOLOGY:The Effects of Media Violence on SocietyCraig A. Anderson and Brad J. Bushman*


No strong link seen between violent video games and aggressionAndrea Lynn, Humanities Editor

Saturday, September 23, 2006

PEER REVIEW: Things to Add

* Read over ALL the peer review advice posted on the blog, and keep it all in mind. You will read some things that are contradictory, but that’s okay. It’s better to have a big tool box with lots of various tools, than to have one tool that you expect to accomplish everything every time (which it won’t).*
_____________________

Ask the writer for things s/he is specifically interested in (particular sections of his/her draft; content—or a specific aspect of content; grammar—or a specific aspect of it). If they don’t ask for anything in particular, focus on content first.

Prioritize—mention the most important issues first, not necessarily all the issues.

Ask the writer to come up with a solution while you are talking with her/him, as an alternative to you offering recommendations.

Check to make sure the peer you’re reviewing understands your meaning.

Review your reviewer! Some people offer higher quality advice about some things than other people about other things.

Friday, September 22, 2006

EXPLORING THE LITERATURE REVIEW GENRE; or, The Best of Your Answers, With Modifications

The answers generated this time on your own—before my own comments were added—were richer than last time, and potentially more useful to people writing in this genre (literature review) for the first time, people like you! When you use this to evaluate your own work, you'll need to change and add to some of the questions here. For example, for all the points under, "WHAT DOES THE WRITER WANT TO ACCOMPLISH?" you need to ask yourself, "Do I accomplish this?" and "How did I accomplish it?"

Some of the answers were still bogged down in the details of individual literature reviews, rather than commenting on the genre as a whole. Think about it this way. If someone asked you, “What is a movie?” and you described ONLY one movie, you would be omitting all the other things that movies can be; if the person asking you wanted to try to make a movie based on those answers, they would be severely limited and would end up reproducing the one movie you described instead of making a brand new movie.

That’s why you need to think of general, shared details. The writer can supply his or her own details. Now, on to the Field, Mode, and Tenor of Literature Reviews.
_______________________

HOW ARE LITERATURE REVIEWS STRUCTURED?
1) Introduction, stating the specific question that the three sources being covered are meant to answer.
2) Summary of 1st source (1-2 paragraphs)
3) Brief evaluation of 1st source (1 paragraph)
4) REPEAT FOR SUBSEQUENT SOURCES
5) Conclusion, evaluating all sources collectively

WHO IS GETTING NEW INFORMATION?
The author, the instructor
People who MAY BE familiar with the topic, but have not read these three sources yet
People who MAY NOT BE familiar with the topic

WHO IS INVOLVED BUT NOT MENTIONED?
Readers and writers
The people who will read stuff written by the reader that’s based on the sources you reviewed

WHAT DOES THE WRITER WANT TO ACCOMPLISH?
Inform readers about useful and/or useless sources related to the topic
Inform readers about new views on the topic
Inform readers about important writers on the topic
Persuade readers that these sources are useful/useless
Show readers that s/he is connected to important sources and writers related to the topic
Show readers that s/he can analyze and critique complicated material
Get an A

HOW DOES IT CONVINCE TARGET READERS?
It depends on the topic and target readers/audiences

WHAT MEDIA ARE USED?
You’ll be using web pages, but print is often used, too. Writing is the PRIMARY medium; other media (images, audio/video, etc.) may be used, but minimally.

WHAT’S THE GENRE CALLED?
Literature review

HOW LONG ARE PARAGRAPHS IN THIS GENRE?
Generally 6-8 sentences, sometimes slightly more or less

WHAT KIND OF VOCABULARY IS EMPLOYED?
It depends on the target audience. If they are knowledgeable (for example, colleagues in a field), more specialized to the topic/field; if it’s one that isn’t very familiar, specialized vocabulary with explanations using general vocabulary.

IS THE AUDIENCE LIBERAL OR CONSERVATIVE?
It depends on the audience; sometimes politics won’t matter. You do, however, ALWAYS have to be aware of what the audience believes/doesn’t believe and what they value/don’t value about the topic. Based on that, you’ll know how hard they have to work to put their opinion across—and if the audience can be persuaded or not.

WHO WOULD BE THE MOST INTERESTED?
People who will DO SOMETHING with the literature review
People who already have certain knowledge about the subject
People who are inclined toward interest in the subject

WHAT WILL THE READER DO (not think) WITH IT AFTER READING?
Find and read/watch/listen to those sources themselves (or avoid them and look for others)
Make reading suggestions to someone else
Write something based on those sources

IS THE TONE RESPECTFUL?
Yes. Criticisms are specific and directed at the source, not at the writer or anything/anyone else beyond the review itself.

IS THERE EMOTIONAL CONTENT?
No.

WHAT KINDS OF SOURCES ARE REVIEWED IN LITERATURE REVIEWS?
Materials that would be complex enough to be useful for ACADEMIC or PROFESSIONAL readers
Sources that are at least 2000 words long

Monday, September 18, 2006

peer review

  • mention positive
  • repectful
  • make sure you're right
  • talk about emotional impact
  • don't use "good" or "bad"
  • give opinions as reader
  • suggest better expression

Monday, September 11, 2006

Audience Analysis

My topic is effects from playing violent games. My audience are for the young who play games.
They don't beleive that playing violent games does not affect to them. They do not know
how serious playing violent game is. They read the preview articles from a player who played beta game, TV shows, and magazines for games.

Friday, September 08, 2006

EXPLORING THE GENRE I: Follow-up

By and large, your findings about the essays were on the money, although there were instances of confusion on what constituted "field," "tenor," and "mode" (we'll talk about it again later). Some groups came up with multiple writer goals, which illustrates an important point--that quality writing is able to get more than one thing done at a time, and that a skilled writer will always try to get multiple things done with one text. It was surprising, though, that there was little mention of two of the most important goals of topic proposals written by students that would be read by their instructors:

1. to convince the instructors that the chosen topic is worthy of study for an entire semester, and
2. to get the best grade possible

Whenever you examine any text, either by itself or as an example of a particular genre, think beyond what's explicitly written on the page/screen. This goes for tenor, as well as for field: the people involved aren't only the people mentioned in writing. They are the writer(s), the reader(s), and sometimes people who would be effected by actions taken by audience members after reading the writing.

You'll do this kind of analysis for the other three projects in the coming months. When you do, don't get bogged down in the details of individual essays--look for the commonalities. Remember that you're exploring an entire genre and making hypotheses about the norms of that genre as a whole, and not about individual instances of it. Knowing how an entire genre works is going to be much more helpful to you and to your fellow writers in the long run.

Group3-Yongsol,YooJin,Cesar,Aldo

Field for the first essay is that a Bolivia guy who is talking about the political shift after Evo Morales won the presidential elections last spring. His main goal is that he wants to see an international effect on this political phenomenom.

Tenor for the first essay the Bolivian society (family, Capitalist), Evo Morales, other people such as Donald Rumsfeld, South Amercan society, Chavez, Venezuela. The relation ship is the "Democratic Dictatorship" among South American countries, the political shift phenomenon between capitalist and radicals like Chavez and Morales.

Mode for the fisrt essay

Second essay- Purdue Meal Plan

Field- his goal is improving purdue meal plan
Tenor- people between purdue studuent and purdue dining courts
mode- topinc porposal for essaies, web pages
he use pretty godd vocab andit make the essay more interesting

Third essay-Online computer game addiction
field:conten-online game addiciotn
goals-to find out what drives people to spend much time in online game and the influencetenor:people-readers,writer,online gamers
relationship-online gamers have addiction problem and the writer is also an online gamer

mode:cahnnel of communitcation-online computer game and webpage
textual concern:monologue,general vocabulary

Wednesday, September 06, 2006

9/8/06: EXPLORING THE GENRE I

Today, you will be working in groups, and in the process discovering one of the other applications of the class blog--a record of your in-class activities.

DON'T make a separate blog entry for each person in the group. There should be only one blog entry per group. Ask someone to volunteer--or nominate someone--to serve as the group note taker. S/He will record the group's answers in the blog on her/his own name, and post the answers to the blog 5-10 minutes before the end of class.

Before posting the blog, make sure to put the names of all the group members into the post.
________________

YOUR ASSIGNMENT: Look over the project 1 samples again, and talk in the group about the FIELD ("contents and objectives"), the TENOR ("social roles of and relationships between the participants"), and the MODE ("communication aspects"). Record your findings and your disagreements on the blog.

Good luck!